Monday, January 21, 2013
Probably million of words are published daily on blogs. How many are read by anyone but the author and a few friends. Similarly millions of words appear in the Congressional Record each year. Have you ever read even a paragraph from the Congressional Record?
What impels you to take time and read a blog? Or for that matter anything?
Think about these questions as you read or write your next blog. And it you’re so inclined, please tell me what you think.
Yes No Maybe
__ __ __ I read blogs with catchy titles.
__ __ __ Does humor make a title interesting?
__ __ __ Do personal questions in the title draw you in?
__ __ __ I read blogs that provide me with useful info, i.e. I’m a writer and find writers’ blogs helpful.
__ __ __ I like blogs that mention science.
__ __ __ I like blogs that mention politics.
__ __ __ I like blogs that mention the paranormal.
__ __ __ It’s a habit. I generally read this blog.
__ __ __ I read blogs, which were cited elsewhere.
Maybe writing successful blogs is like writing legislation that is eventually enacted. Otto von Bismark is credited with saying: “Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made.”
In any case, I’m interested in your thoughts. Please make a comment.
Not knowing how to interest others in my blog bugs me.
Friday, January 11, 2013
Many Americans consider science to be collection of boring facts, as dry as the stuffed animals and bones in natural history museums. That’s an unfortunate misconception, which probably reflects poorly taught classes in school.
Science should be thought of as a verb not a noun. Science is the collecting of information on the natural world in an organized and systematic way and the applying the accumulated knowledge to solve problems or test hypotheses.
Aha, you say. That definition of science sounds a bit like crime solving and mystery writing, actually novel writing in general.
Writing is a lot like doing a science experiment.
1. Writers and scientists make observations. (Granted scientists try to quantitate their observations more than writers.)
2. They organize their observations into a whole (i.e. writers develop plot; scientists – hypotheses).
3. They test and refine their “whole,” (i.e. writers edit their prose; scientists run experiments.)
Science and writing both require a lot of hard work to gain occasional flashes of insights. To paraphrase Thomas Edison, they’re “one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration.”
Science and writing are both dynamic. Both, when well done, generate further thought. So, I think our society needs more of both.
Oak Tree Press will be publishing my new medical mystery Murder: A New Way to Lose Weight in March 2013.